×

Should you trust the customer ratings on Rachael Ray dog food? Discover the actual pros and cons shared by dog owners.

Should you trust the customer ratings on Rachael Ray dog food? Discover the actual pros and cons shared by dog owners.

Should you trust the customer ratings on Rachael Ray dog food? Discover the actual pros and cons shared by dog owners.

So, I decided to give Rachael Ray dog food a shot a while back. Heard a lot about it, saw it everywhere, figured why not see what the fuss was about for my own dog, Buster.

Should you trust the customer ratings on Rachael Ray dog food? Discover the actual pros and cons shared by dog owners.

First thing I did, naturally, was poke around online. You know how it is. Saw the usual stuff, some folks raving, others not so much. Found out it meets the AAFCO standards, which basically means it's got the minimum nutrition stuff covered. That’s good, a basic checkmark.

But then I also stumbled across some articles, you might have seen them too, where the FDA mentioned it along with a bunch of other brands potentially linked to heart problems in dogs. That definitely made me stop and think. Didn't want to mess around with Buster's health, obviously. But the info was kinda vague, "may be linked," so it wasn't a definite no-go, just something to keep in mind.

Trying it Out

Decided to grab a small bag anyway, I think it was the chicken one. Can't commit to a giant bag right off the bat, especially with Buster being kinda picky sometimes. Started mixing it in slowly with his old food, like you're supposed to. Didn't want any stomach upsets.

  • Day 1-3: Mostly old food, tiny bit of the new stuff. Buster ate it, no major complaints.
  • Day 4-6: Bit more of the Rachael Ray, less of the old. Still okay. He seemed to actually pick out the new kibble bits first sometimes.
  • Day 7 onwards: Switched over completely.

Honestly, Buster seemed to really like it. He'd finish his bowl pretty quick, which isn't always the case. That was a plus. Reminded me of what some reviews said, that their dogs enjoyed it. His energy levels seemed fine, coat looked okay, no weird digestive issues. So far, so good on the surface.

Digging a Little Deeper

While Buster was eating it, I kept reading bits and pieces. Found out how it's made – hot extruded, basically cooked under high heat and pressure. And that it uses 'feed grade' ingredients, not 'human grade'. Now, lots of dog foods are made this way, it's pretty standard, but combined with that FDA heart thing still rattling around in my head, it just gave me a bit of an 'eh' feeling. Is 'good enough' really good enough?

This whole dog food thing happened right when we were having that crazy plumbing issue in the house. Remember telling my neighbor about it? Pipes backed up, cost a fortune to fix. Stressful time. And here I was, worrying about dog food ingredients on top of everything else. It felt like another one of those decisions where you're trying to do the right thing, weigh the pros and cons, but there's always some doubt. Like, Buster seemed happy and healthy eating it, it was convenient to buy, wasn't outrageously expensive. But that FDA flag and the ingredient quality... it just kept nagging at me, especially with everything else going on.

In the end, we finished the bag. Buster did fine on it, genuinely. No complaints from him. But with that lingering doubt, fueled by the FDA mention and the ingredient details, I decided to switch him back to his old food afterwards, the one I just felt a bit more comfortable with long-term. It wasn't a disaster trying Rachael Ray's food, not at all. Buster liked it. But for me, peace of mind counts for a lot, especially after dealing with that plumbing nightmare. Just wanted one less thing to vaguely worry about, you know?